<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DennisTobenski.com News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dennistobenski.com/news/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news</link>
	<description>The blog of composer/vocalist Dennis Tobenski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:57:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer’s Guide to Doing Business: Copyright Part 2 by Dennis Tobenski</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/26/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-copyright-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4053</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Tobenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/26/#comment-4053</guid>
		<description>Hey, Nick! Glad to hear it! I&#039;ve got a bit of catching up to do, myself, so I&#039;ll be following the twice-a-month schedule til I&#039;m caught up. Kind of obsessed lately with the idea of amortizing expenses - so much simpler than dropping a ton of money in one go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Nick! Glad to hear it! I&#8217;ve got a bit of catching up to do, myself, so I&#8217;ll be following the twice-a-month schedule til I&#8217;m caught up. Kind of obsessed lately with the idea of amortizing expenses &#8211; so much simpler than dropping a ton of money in one go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer’s Guide to Doing Business: Copyright Part 2 by Dennis Tobenski</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/26/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-copyright-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3938</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Tobenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/26/#comment-3938</guid>
		<description>Hi JW,

You are totally right that the most egregious thing we&#039;re likely to run into in our careers is an unlicensed performance, or a dance company or non-profit using our work without asking. And the best way to handle that is probably a phone call or an email.  Lawyering up at the drop of a hat certainly isn’t the way to go, but we should be prepared to protect our interests in the event that something major does happen.  The phone call/email/asking gently option was quite the oversight on my part, and one that I’ll address more fully next week – so I sincerely thank you for pointing it out!

I still think it’s important to register your copyrights for the same reason I think it’s important to have home or renter’s insurance.  Most of us (knock wood) &lt;em&gt;won’t&lt;/em&gt; have to deal with the heartbreak and anxiety of losing everything in a flood or earthquake or fire or other disaster.  And most of us also won’t have to deal with any sort of major copyright infringement.  But it’s not unheard of, even in our industry.  I’ve got an example in mind that was related to me, in which someone &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; put their name to another person’s score, but I don’t want to share it here until I check that I’ve remembered the details correctly.  I’ll post it here when I’ve heard back.

Also – thanks so much for commenting! I’m glad to hear that you’re enjoying the series!

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JW,</p>
<p>You are totally right that the most egregious thing we&#8217;re likely to run into in our careers is an unlicensed performance, or a dance company or non-profit using our work without asking. And the best way to handle that is probably a phone call or an email.  Lawyering up at the drop of a hat certainly isn’t the way to go, but we should be prepared to protect our interests in the event that something major does happen.  The phone call/email/asking gently option was quite the oversight on my part, and one that I’ll address more fully next week – so I sincerely thank you for pointing it out!</p>
<p>I still think it’s important to register your copyrights for the same reason I think it’s important to have home or renter’s insurance.  Most of us (knock wood) <em>won’t</em> have to deal with the heartbreak and anxiety of losing everything in a flood or earthquake or fire or other disaster.  And most of us also won’t have to deal with any sort of major copyright infringement.  But it’s not unheard of, even in our industry.  I’ve got an example in mind that was related to me, in which someone <em>did</em> put their name to another person’s score, but I don’t want to share it here until I check that I’ve remembered the details correctly.  I’ll post it here when I’ve heard back.</p>
<p>Also – thanks so much for commenting! I’m glad to hear that you’re enjoying the series!</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer’s Guide to Doing Business: Copyright Part 2 by JW</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/26/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-copyright-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3923</link>
		<dc:creator>JW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/26/#comment-3923</guid>
		<description>I really appreciate this series and your work on it, but in this case I&#039;m going to disagree with your premise.  It&#039;s vanishingly unlikely that any given piece would be used in a way to which a lawsuit would be the best response.  

Aside from file sharing, the most common copyright-abuse scenario is a small non-profit like a dance or theater company using a recording of a piece without any attempt to license it (either willfully or in ignorance).  The most consistently productive response to that is contacting them and insisting on a retroactive licensing fee.  Suing them would be enormously counterproductive in career terms.  

I am constantly hearing stories of composers successfully interacting with users who didn&#039;t know they needed a license.  Those users need a push, not a lawsuit.  

(At least in concert music, I have *never* heard any modern example of the copyright theft of popular imagination -- someone just claiming they&#039;re the actual creator of another person&#039;s score.)

Registering copyrights at $35 a pop feels to me less like insurance and more like entering a vague lottery in which the prizes/payoffs aren&#039;t defined or realistically imagined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate this series and your work on it, but in this case I&#8217;m going to disagree with your premise.  It&#8217;s vanishingly unlikely that any given piece would be used in a way to which a lawsuit would be the best response.  </p>
<p>Aside from file sharing, the most common copyright-abuse scenario is a small non-profit like a dance or theater company using a recording of a piece without any attempt to license it (either willfully or in ignorance).  The most consistently productive response to that is contacting them and insisting on a retroactive licensing fee.  Suing them would be enormously counterproductive in career terms.  </p>
<p>I am constantly hearing stories of composers successfully interacting with users who didn&#8217;t know they needed a license.  Those users need a push, not a lawsuit.  </p>
<p>(At least in concert music, I have *never* heard any modern example of the copyright theft of popular imagination &#8212; someone just claiming they&#8217;re the actual creator of another person&#8217;s score.)</p>
<p>Registering copyrights at $35 a pop feels to me less like insurance and more like entering a vague lottery in which the prizes/payoffs aren&#8217;t defined or realistically imagined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer’s Guide to Doing Business: Copyright Part 2 by Nick Norton</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/26/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-copyright-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3904</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/26/#comment-3904</guid>
		<description>Hey, I just went on and registered my string quartet after reading this. I like the one a month idea to get through my &quot;back catalog&quot; without spending a ton at once. Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I just went on and registered my string quartet after reading this. I like the one a month idea to get through my &#8220;back catalog&#8221; without spending a ton at once. Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer&#8217;s Guide to Doing Business: Introduction by Dennis Tobenski</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-3020</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Tobenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/#comment-3020</guid>
		<description>This is all true. I&#039;m totally with you on the skill usage and ability find recognition from within the academic system. But at the same time, a composer-in-academia&#039;s skills are put to use in a very different way from how they are when actively composing, and are employed to a different end. Educating the next generation of composers, while absolutely necessary and worthwhile, isn&#039;t done in service of the composer&#039;s own music, but in service of his bank account and ability to pay his bills, and possibly to some degree to fulfill a sense of responsibility to the community.

There are, of course, composers who have a drive to teach, and for whom the balance between composing and teaching is a happy one. Others - and these are the ones I&#039;m mainly speaking to when I say that teaching is a &quot;day job&quot; - teach only to get by, to subsidize their composing time. I have my own (probably strange and logically faulty) designations of composers in my head that are dependent largely on the composer&#039;s &lt;em&gt;intent&lt;/em&gt; in regards to their music.

So for some composers it isn&#039;t a day job, for some it is, and for many it&#039;s probably in the halfway-space. I actually have a multi-part section - &quot;The Composer and the Day Job&quot; - planned down the road where I intend to address all of this in more depth, &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; after talking to a range of composers in academia so that I&#039;m not talking completely out of my sit-upon. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all true. I&#8217;m totally with you on the skill usage and ability find recognition from within the academic system. But at the same time, a composer-in-academia&#8217;s skills are put to use in a very different way from how they are when actively composing, and are employed to a different end. Educating the next generation of composers, while absolutely necessary and worthwhile, isn&#8217;t done in service of the composer&#8217;s own music, but in service of his bank account and ability to pay his bills, and possibly to some degree to fulfill a sense of responsibility to the community.</p>
<p>There are, of course, composers who have a drive to teach, and for whom the balance between composing and teaching is a happy one. Others &#8211; and these are the ones I&#8217;m mainly speaking to when I say that teaching is a &#8220;day job&#8221; &#8211; teach only to get by, to subsidize their composing time. I have my own (probably strange and logically faulty) designations of composers in my head that are dependent largely on the composer&#8217;s <em>intent</em> in regards to their music.</p>
<p>So for some composers it isn&#8217;t a day job, for some it is, and for many it&#8217;s probably in the halfway-space. I actually have a multi-part section &#8211; &#8220;The Composer and the Day Job&#8221; &#8211; planned down the road where I intend to address all of this in more depth, <em>and</em> after talking to a range of composers in academia so that I&#8217;m not talking completely out of my sit-upon. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer&#8217;s Guide to Doing Business: Introduction by Chris B.</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-3016</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/#comment-3016</guid>
		<description>Glad you&#039;re doing this, it&#039;s always a pleasure to read everything you write. I do want to stick up very mildly for academia, and dispute the notion that academia, for a composer, is not just a day job but the EPITOME of a day job. Sure, it&#039;s a day job in the sense that hours spent teaching are hours spent not composing, but crucially, it actually relies on (much of) the same expertise and training that one uses in one&#039;s non-day job. I think that fact at least puts academia into a kind of halfway-space between a true day job and actual composerly activity. And there also is the fact that academia can provide pathways to certain kinds of recognition and success for composers-qua-composers, since universities are some of the few places where music is shielded a bit from pure market pressures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you&#8217;re doing this, it&#8217;s always a pleasure to read everything you write. I do want to stick up very mildly for academia, and dispute the notion that academia, for a composer, is not just a day job but the EPITOME of a day job. Sure, it&#8217;s a day job in the sense that hours spent teaching are hours spent not composing, but crucially, it actually relies on (much of) the same expertise and training that one uses in one&#8217;s non-day job. I think that fact at least puts academia into a kind of halfway-space between a true day job and actual composerly activity. And there also is the fact that academia can provide pathways to certain kinds of recognition and success for composers-qua-composers, since universities are some of the few places where music is shielded a bit from pure market pressures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer&#8217;s Guide to Doing Business: Introduction by Dennis Tobenski</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Tobenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/#comment-3015</guid>
		<description>Basically, yes. At least as I understand their situation. I could be overestimating their success, but at the very least that&#039;s the vibe that I get from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, yes. At least as I understand their situation. I could be overestimating their success, but at the very least that&#8217;s the vibe that I get from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer&#8217;s Guide to Doing Business: Introduction by Nick Norton</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/#comment-3014</guid>
		<description>Also, who are this substantial cadre of young composers living solely off commissions and royalties? Is that more or less the New Amsterdam crowd?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, who are this substantial cadre of young composers living solely off commissions and royalties? Is that more or less the New Amsterdam crowd?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer&#8217;s Guide to Doing Business: Introduction by Dennis Tobenski</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-3011</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Tobenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/#comment-3011</guid>
		<description>And yes to debates! :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes to debates! :-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Composer&#8217;s Guide to Doing Business: Introduction by Dennis Tobenski</title>
		<link>http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/the-composers-guide-to-doing-business-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Tobenski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dennistobenski.com/news/2012/01/05/#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually in the right-hand nav bar at the moment, though I&#039;ll happily add it to the post itself ;-)  Starting next week, it&#039;s definitely going in the actual post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually in the right-hand nav bar at the moment, though I&#8217;ll happily add it to the post itself ;-)  Starting next week, it&#8217;s definitely going in the actual post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

